After years of internal wrangling, the high-profile brand dispute between real estate tycoons Abhishek and Abhinandan Lodha has finally come to an end. The brothers, who lead Macrotech Developers and House of Abhinandan (HoABL), respectively, have agreed to amicably settle their differences regarding the usage of the brand name. The settlement was achieved through mediation, overseen by retired Justice R.V. Raveendran, as directed by the Bombay High Court.
This legal battle, which escalated into a ₹5,000 crore brand infringement lawsuit, marks a significant chapter in the Lodha family’s business history. While the detailed terms of the agreement are yet to be disclosed, sources close to the matter suggest that both parties are now focused on moving forward. Here’s a closer look at how this feud unfolded and what it means for the Indian real estate sector.
A Timeline of the Lodha Brand Dispute
The feud between the brothers dates back several years and revolves around the use of the prestigious “ surname in branding real estate ventures.
- Abhishek heads Macrotech Developers, popularly known for luxury real estate projects under the ” brand.
- Abhinandan runs HoABL, a plotted development firm operating in places like Goa, Ayodhya, and beyond.
In January 2025, Macrotech filed a trademark infringement lawsuit in the Bombay High Court, alleging that HoABL was misusing the Lodha brand to promote its projects and capitalizing on the reputation built by Macrotech over the years.
The ₹5,000 Crore Legal Battle
The lawsuit filed by Macrotech not only aimed to stop HoABL from using the “Lodha” name but also sought ₹5,000 crore in damages. The suit argued that the use of the Lodha name by HoABL could confuse customers and dilute the brand’s premium positioning in the market.
According to legal sources, Macrotech emphasized that despite past family settlement agreements, Abhinandan’s firm’s continued use of the brand violated intellectual property rights.
Mediation and the Role of Justice R.V. Raveendran
In an attempt to resolve the matter outside the courtroom, the Bombay High Court appointed retired Justice R.V. Raveendran to mediate between the two parties. Justice Raveendran is known for his impartiality and deep legal expertise, having mediated in several high-profile disputes in the past.
After three months of closed-door mediation, sources confirm that the two parties have now reached an amicable agreement. Although the exact terms of the settlement are confidential, insiders believe that both brothers have agreed on clear boundaries for brand usage to avoid future conflicts.
What This Settlement Means for the Real Estate Industry
This case highlights the importance of brand clarity and intellectual property protection in India’s competitive real estate sector. With family-run businesses often split among generations, disputes over brand names are not uncommon.
However, the Lodha brothers choosing mediation over prolonged litigation sends a positive signal to the market. It shows that even high-stake disagreements can be resolved through dialogue and mutual respect.
This resolution also allows both Macrotech Developers and HoABL to focus on growth and innovation without the cloud of legal conflict hanging over their operations.
RECENT NEWS
5 Reasons Why Apple Builds iPhones in China—and It’s Not Cheap Labor
Final Thoughts
The end of the brand dispute is a relief for the Lodha family and stakeholders, investors, and the broader real estate community. It reaffirms the importance of mediation and the maturity to prioritize business over ego.
As the details of the settlement emerge in the coming weeks, the focus will now shift to how both companies redefine their branding strategies and differentiate themselves in the market—while carrying the legacy of the name forward in their own distinct ways.
Disclaimer:
This article is for informational purposes only. MoneyFlowInsight does not provide legal, financial, or professional advice. Please verify facts through official sources before taking any action.
One thought on “Lodha Brothers Settle Explosive Brand Dispute After Court Mediation”